Harry B. Peacock v. City Miami Harry B. Peacock v. City Miami

Harry B. Peacock v. City Miami

FL.40342; 133 So. 549, 101 Fla. 140 (1931)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Per Curiam. -- In this case Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed while Mr. Chief Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court are sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1931
6 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
1
Página
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
52.9
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Florida

Dan Kelly v. State Dan Kelly v. State
1938
J. Carl Tegder v. Snelson Investment Company J. Carl Tegder v. Snelson Investment Company
1943
United Brotherhood Carpenters and Joiners America v. Graves Investment Company United Brotherhood Carpenters and Joiners America v. Graves Investment Company
1943
Stafford Allison v. L. R. Baker Stafford Allison v. L. R. Baker
1943
Joe Finley v. State Florida Joe Finley v. State Florida
1943
Clark B. Davis and Leland Hyzer v. Hefty Press Clark B. Davis and Leland Hyzer v. Hefty Press
1943