Harry E. Mchugh v. C. D. Haley Harry E. Mchugh v. C. D. Haley

Harry E. Mchugh v. C. D. Haley

ND.123 , 237 N.W. 835, D. 359 (1931)(61 N)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

This is an action by Harry E. McHugh, Incorporated, a corporation, to quiet title to an easement over property belonging to the defendant and to secure a permanent injunction against interference with the enjoyment thereof. The plaintiff had judgment in the district court and the defendant appeals to this court for a trial de novo. Prior to 1927 a corporation known as Bovey-Shute & Jackson, Incorporated, was the owner of lots numbered from one to six, inclusive, lots 9 and 10, and the south fifty feet of lots 7 and 8, in block 22, of the original townsite of the city of Devils Lake. In 1918 it secured a franchise permitting the construction and maintenance of a spur track in the alley of this block and extending over the rear or south end of the lots above described, and it entered into a spur track agreement with the Great Northern Railway, binding upon heirs, legal representatives and successors, to permit the railway company to use the track and any extension, connection or diverging spur for the purpose of serving business and industries other than the business and industries of the applicant. Under this franchise and agreement the spur track was constructed. In March, 1927, the plaintiff purchased from Bovey-Shute & Jackson, Incorporated, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, in block 22, together with an easement over the remainder of the lots for the use of the spur track. The conveyance was made by a warranty deed which contained the following provision after the description of the property conveyed: ""Also giving and granting to second party the right to the use, for transportation purposes, of the railroad spur track on the rear of Lots Seven, Eight, Nine and Ten of said Block Twenty-two, in accordance with spur track agreement dated August 19th, 1918, between Bovey-Shute Lumber Company and Great Northern Railway Company; provided the track shall not be used by second party for storage purposes; and provided that first party, its successors or assigns, will not cause the same to be removed or discontinued without the consent of second party."" This deed was recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Ramsey County on March 12, 1927, and in the course of a few days it was redelivered to the plaintiff with a certificate thereon certifying to the fact that it had been recorded. At the time of recording it the register of deeds noted it in the numerical index only as against lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, failing to make any notation as against the remaining lots 7, 8, 9 and 10. On July 17, 1928, the defendant Haley purchased from Bovey-Shute & Jackson, Incorporated, and obtained conveyance by warranty deed recorded on the same day, the south or rear fifty feet of lots 7 and 8 and all of lots 9 and 10 in block 22. In purchasing this property the defendant relied on an abstract which failed to show that the lots purchased were affected by the plaintiff's easement, the abstracter, apparently, having been misled by the failure of the register of deeds to make proper notation in the numerical index.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1931
18 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
22
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66.7
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of North Dakota

Jensina Dolphin v. Lewis N. Peterson Jensina Dolphin v. Lewis N. Peterson
1933
J.L. Page v. Augusta Steinke J.L. Page v. Augusta Steinke
1931
Edward J. Hagan v. John I. Havnvik Edward J. Hagan v. John I. Havnvik
1988
Matter Disciplinary Action Against Lorene Matter Disciplinary Action Against Lorene
1992
Muriel Brown v. North Dakota State Muriel Brown v. North Dakota State
1985
Terry L. Barnes v. Larry Sunderman Terry L. Barnes v. Larry Sunderman
1990