![Helen and Luis Charbonier and Raul Charbonier v. Winston W. Wynne](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Helen and Luis Charbonier and Raul Charbonier v. Winston W. Wynne](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Helen and Luis Charbonier and Raul Charbonier v. Winston W. Wynne
1973.FL.42183 282 SO. 2D 171
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
By appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage the husband (appellant) asserts the following four alleged errors: (1) The trial court erred in declaring the parties adult son a dependent within the meaning of Florida Statute 743.07(2) and in considering that dependency in awarding to the wife lump sum alimony; (2) the trial court erred in awarding the wife lump sum alimony in the amount of $63,000.00; (3) the trial court erred in requiring the husband to maintain life insurance on his life for the benefit of the wife; and (4) the trial court erred in awarding the wife attorneys fees.