![Hellman v. La Cumbre Golf and Country Club](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Hellman v. La Cumbre Golf and Country Club](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Hellman v. La Cumbre Golf and Country Club
1992.CA.40773 8 CAL. RPTR. 2D 293; 6 CAL. APP. 4TH 1224
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Plaintiffs in a wrongful death action appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Alza Corporation, after the trial court determined as a matter of law that the intrauterine device (IUD) manufactured by Alza was a prescription drug within the meaning of Brown v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal. 3d 1049 [245 Cal. Rptr. 412, 751 P.2d 470] and that the warnings given by Alza to the physician were adequate as a matter of law.