Henderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Henderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Henderson v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co‪.‬

113 CAL.RPTR.3D 692, 187 CAL.APP.4TH 215, 2010 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 12,237, 10 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 10,075, 2010.CA.0005610

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Plaintiff Susan Hendersons counsel went "all in" on a bad bet. First, he waited until the eleventh hour to begin opposing a summary judgment motion he had known about for months. Next, he assigned the preparation of that opposition to a paralegal who he failed to supervise. Finally, learning that the paralegal had left the state with the opposition the last business day before it had to be filed without his having seen it, he hoped for a miracle instead of immediately going to court to request an extension of time. Because these are inexcusable mistakes, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hendersons request for discretionary relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b) (hereafter section 473(b)), from entry of summary judgment in favor of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E). We also agree, with the majority of courts who have decided the issue, that Henderson is not entitled to mandatory relief under section 473(b) because such relief is not available for summary judgments. Accordingly, we affirm the post-judgment order denying Hendersons motion to vacate the summary judgment.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2010
5 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
27
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
84.1
KB

Más libros de Colorado Supreme Court

Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996
People v. Woodrum People v. Woodrum
1996
In re Title In re Title
1996
People v. Bauder People v. Bauder
1997