Hendricks v. Johnson Hendricks v. Johnson

Hendricks v. Johnson

KY.40263; 297 Ky. 643; 180 S.W.2d 868 (1944)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

TILFORD, Justice. At the outset it is necessary to note the fact that in the statement of appeal which we have followed in captioning this opinion, the actual appellees are designated as appellants, and the actual appellants, as appellees. While this error would justify us in dismissing the appeal, we have concluded, since counsel have not raised the point, to ignore the error, although, in the interest of clarity, it is necessary in expressing our views to refer to the named appellees as appellants and to the named appellants as appellees. With this explanation, we shall outline the facts as we have been able to gather them from the incomplete and confused record on which the parties have elected to prosecute this appeal.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1944
26 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
51.8
KB

Más libros de Court Of Appeals Of Kentucky

Jennings v. Jennings Jennings v. Jennings
1945
Riedling v. Harrod Riedling v. Harrod
1944
Redding v. Main Redding v. Main
1946
Sasaki v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Sasaki v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
1972
Mcintosh v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Mcintosh v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
1979
Courier-Journal and Louisville Times Co. v. University of Louisville Board of Trustees Courier-Journal and Louisville Times Co. v. University of Louisville Board of Trustees
1979