L. L. Williams v. Charles G. Mack and L. L. Williams v. Charles G. Mack and

L. L. Williams v. Charles G. Mack and

MN.92 , 278 N.W. 585, 402 (1938)(202 Minn)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Optometry -- regulation and license of practice. 1. On this appeal it is not necessary to decide whether an optometrist should be classified as a member of a learned profession or not, for, however designated, his optometric work is within the domain of the police power of the state and subject to legislative regulations in the interest of public health.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1938
1 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
11
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
62.9
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982