L. Meisenhelder v. H. E. Byram and Others L. Meisenhelder v. H. E. Byram and Others

L. Meisenhelder v. H. E. Byram and Others

MN.428 , 233 N.W. 849, 615 (1930)(182 Minn)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

When no inference that coupler is defective. 1. A car coupler in which there are no mechanical defects and which operates properly both before and after an accident cannot be found to be defective merely because a brakeman, while riding on the moving car in a switching operation, failed to lift the coupler pin by pressing on the pin lifter with his foot.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1930
19 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
64.3
KB

Más libros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982