Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co. Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co.

Neuhoff v. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co‪.‬

370 F.3d 197, 2004.C01.0000239

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Plaintiffs-appellants, Roger and Louise Neuhoff (hereinafter jointly referred to as ""the Neuhoffs"") brought a diversity action against defendants-appellees Marvin Lumber & Cedar Company and Marvin Windows of Tennessee, Inc. (hereinafter jointly referred to as ""Marvin"") for breach of an oral contract, breach of implied warranty, violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A, and promissory estoppel. The district court granted Marvin's motion for summary judgment on all four claims. We conclude that the district court appropriately granted summary judgment on the first three claims, but inappropriately granted summary judgment on the promissory estoppel claim. We, therefore, affirm in part and reverse in part. I. Background In 1991, the Neuhoffs purchased and installed sixty windows manufactured by Marvin. In 1994, the Neuhoffs noticed that many of the windows were decaying and notified Simon Hickman, the contractor who installed the windows, of the decay.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2004
7 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
14
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
66.3
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft Ponta-Garca v. Ashcroft
2004
In re Colarusso In re Colarusso
2004
Mihaylov v. Ashcroft Mihaylov v. Ashcroft
2004
Anderson v. City of Boston Anderson v. City of Boston
2004
Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation Fit Tech, Inc. v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation
2004
United States v. Patel United States v. Patel
2004