Office Of Public Utility Counsel V. Public Utility Commission Of Texas Office Of Public Utility Counsel V. Public Utility Commission Of Texas

Office Of Public Utility Counsel V. Public Utility Commission Of Texas

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

In this direct appeal, the Office of Public Utility Counsel ("Public Counsel") challenges two amended rules promulgated by the Public Utility Commission ("the Commission") as being outside the scope of the Commission's authority under chapter 39 of the utility code. See Tex. Util. Code Ann. §§ 39.001-.909, 39.001(f) (West Supp. 2003). The challenged rules deal with: (1) the authority of competitive retail electricity providers to request disconnection of customer electricity service and (2) the rate to be charged by Providers of Last Resort, the default electricity providers under deregulation. See 27 Tex. Reg. 8428, 8463-65, 8474 (2002) (to be codified at 16 Tex. Admin. Code §§ 25.43, 25.483). Because we believe the amended rules are within the Commission's statutory authority, we will affirm them as amended.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
10 de abril
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
22
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
83.5
KB

Más libros de Texas Court of Appeals

Kersey v. Wilson Kersey v. Wilson
2002
In re A.P. In re A.P.
2001
Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. C.R Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. C.R
2001
Jenevein v. Friedman Jenevein v. Friedman
2003
In re Powell In re Powell
2002
Bailey v. Progressive County Mutual Insruance Co. Bailey v. Progressive County Mutual Insruance Co.
2002