Oregon v. Langley

Per Curiam. The State has moved for an order supplementing the transcript of testimony so as to include proceedings in connection with the selection of and initial admonitions to the jury, which are not included in the bill of exceptions filed here by the defendant-appellant. The defendant, by letter, has advised the court that he has no objection to the supplementation. For the reasons stated in Kraft v. Montgomery Ward & Co. et al., Or., 315 P.2d 558, the motion is denied; but the bill of exceptions will be returned to the trial court for amendment in that court upon proper application.