Oregon v. Norris-Romine
134 OR.APP. 204, 894 P.2D 1221, 1995.OR.41049
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
In these consolidated cases, the state appeals from the dismissal of accusatory instruments charging defendants Finley and Norris-Romine with violations of stalking protective orders, ORS 163.747 and ORS 163.750. In each case, the ground for dismissal was that the statutory definition of the phrase "without legitimate purpose," as a component of the crime of stalking, is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.