Orrell v. B.F. Goodrich

1 Claimant, Robert Orrell, worked at B.F. Goodrichs tire manufacturing plant for 31 years, retiring in 1986. He filed a claim for compensation with the Oklahoma Workers Compensation Court alleging exposure to certain chemicals at Goodrich caused reduced breathing capacity and injury to his lungs and upper respiratory system. Employer answered denying the claim. A hearing was held before a trial judge. Claimant testified concerning his work history, exposure to certain chemicals and his experience with dyspnea, i.e. shortness of breath. Each side presented depositions, with medical reports attached of one doctor that had examined claimant. Claimants doctor (Dr. A) opined claimant had a Class 2 impairment due to injury to his lungs caused by his 31 years with Goodrich. He rated claimants impairment at 20% permanent partial. Goodrichs doctor (Dr. M) found no impairment and alternatively stated even if claimant had any respiratory impairment "[O]ne would not expect it to be from his work at . . . Goodrich."