Osterman v. Baldwin Osterman v. Baldwin

Osterman v. Baldwin

73 U.S. 116, 1867.SCT.0000005

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Messrs. Adams, Coombs, and Ballinger, for the appellants: 1. The evidence of the deed's having issued, greatly preponderates over that of its having not issued. The possession by the company among its papers, of the certificates, the only evidence of individual ownership, an the testimony of the secretary of the company, offered a strong presumption that there was a deed. The purpose of conveying to Holman was that a deed should issue to him. It matters not, however, as respects this branch of the defence, whether Holman's title were legal or equitable, if he had the real title–of any kind. Equities can be levied on in Texas as well as legal estates.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1867
1 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
11
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
56.9
KB

Más libros de United States Supreme Court

Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Appellate Procedure and Bankruptcy Procedure 2023 Federal Rules of Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Appellate Procedure and Bankruptcy Procedure 2023
2023