Rakhmil Ratush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Rakhmil Ratush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Rakhmil Ratush v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

1992.PA.43244; 619 A.2D 733, 422 PA. SUPER. 389

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

While operating a taxi owned by Alexandria Cab Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, of which he was an officer, Rakhmil Ratush was involved in a motor vehicle accident in Philadelphia on October 12, 1989. The cab was insured under a self-insurance plan issued by I.F.T., Inc. Ratush did not make a claim for first party benefits under this plan. Instead, he sought to recover such benefits from Nationwide Insurance Company, which had issued a policy of insurance providing coverage for a vehicle owned by Ratushs wife. Nationwide denied coverage, and Ratush, therefore, filed the present action to recover first party benefits. The trial court, on petition by Nationwide, entered summary judgment, holding that there was no coverage by virtue of a policy provision which excluded coverage for a vehicle which was being "used to carry persons or property for a fee." Ratush appealed from the judgment.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1992
12 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
5
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENTAS
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
71.3
KB

Más libros de Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. Baldi Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. Baldi
1954
Higgs Et Al. v. New York Fire Ins. Co. Higgs Et Al. v. New York Fire Ins. Co.
1954
Novel v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review Novel v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1953
Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate Investors Et Al. Stachowski v. Incorporated Real Estate Investors Et Al.
1953
Lang Et Ux. v. Recht Et Al. Lang Et Ux. v. Recht Et Al.
1952
Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board Review
1952