Sol v. Aig Hawaii Insurance Co‪.‬

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Upon consideration of defendant-appellee AIG Hawaii Insurance Company's motion for reconsideration filed on May 27, 1994, and it appearing that (1) the amendment to Act 124 referred to in the 1992 House Journal Standing Committee Report proposing a ban on recovery of duplicate payments from uninsured motorist and underinsured motorist coverages was subsequently deleted from the bill, and no further references to this proposed amendment were made in subsequent committee reports, and (2) it appearing that the legislature therefore abandoned the proposed amendment to the statute, and (3) the court having addressed the remaining concerns of the motion for reconsideration in the opinion filed on May 18, 1994, it remains that, pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statues (HRS) 294-7 (1985) and HRS 431:10C-307 (1992), an insured receiving uninsured motorist or underinsured motorist benefits need not reimburse his or her no-fault insurance carrier.