![[U] Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![[U] Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
[U] Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Co.
993 F.2d 1535, 1993.C04.44023
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Per Curiam: Phillip Charles Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. Baltimore Sun Paper Co., No. CA-93-187-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.