[U] Coe v. Wardle [U] Coe v. Wardle

[U] Coe v. Wardle

101 WASH.APP. 1063, 101 WASH.APP. 1063, 2000.WA.0043098

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

To prevail on a defense motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff in a medical malpractice case must meet the statutorily mandated burden of proof. Because the affidavit provided by Coes expert medical witness fails to meet this standard, and because the affidavit did not affirmatively demonstrate that the expert was competent to testify to the matters therein, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to Dr. Wardle.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2000
31 de julio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
8
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
53.5
KB

Más libros de Washington Court of Appeals

Blinka v. Washington State Bar Blinka v. Washington State Bar
2001
Falkner v. Foshaug Falkner v. Foshaug
2001
[U] State v. Averill [U] State v. Averill
2001
[U] State v. Stiffler [U] State v. Stiffler
2001
[U] State v. Clark [U] State v. Clark
2001
[U] State v. Cunningham [U] State v. Cunningham
2000