[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration [U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

[U] Haskins v. Farmers Home Administration

87 F.3d 1319, 1996.C09.42377

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

MEMORANDUM* Chapter 7 debtors Curtis and Mary Ann Haskins (""Haskinses"") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in their action alleging various constitutional and statutory violations arising from loans made by the Farmers Home Administration (""FmHA"") to the Haskinses. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The Haskinses contend that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for defendants on the basis that the Haskinses lacked standing to bring their action against defendants. We review de novo a district court's determination that a party lacks standing to bring an action in federal court. See Bruce v. United States, 759 F.2d 755, 758 (9th Cir. 1985).

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1996
19 de junio
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
3
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
60.2
KB

Más libros de Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Boone United States v. Boone
2000
[T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy [T][U] Hartman v. Mccarthy
1996
[T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. [T][U] Butcher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.
1996
[T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter [T][U] Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Castetter
1996
[T][U] Likes v. Babbitt [T][U] Likes v. Babbitt
1996
[T][U] Bostick v. Reliance Electric [T][U] Bostick v. Reliance Electric
1996