U.S. v. In Long Lee U.S. v. In Long Lee

U.S. v. In Long Lee

904 F.2D 697, 1990.C03.40761

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

In these consolidated appeals from the district courts judgment that affirmed appeals from the bankruptcy court, we must decide if the appellant, who is the trustee of Kumar Bavishi & Associates, debtor, could properly set aside alleged preferential transfers to R. K. Mahajan and S. S. Mahajan, appellees. The bankruptcy judge determined that the trustee did not establish the right to avoid the transfers because the debtor had received new value in a contemporaneous exchange in the form of a loan guarantee. The trustee appealed and the district court affirmed. The trustee has now appealed to us and we affirm.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
1990
24 de mayo
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
30
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
63.4
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Pennsylvania Protection and Advocacy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Pennsylvania Protection and Advocacy, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
2005
Major League Umpires Association v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs Major League Umpires Association v. American League of Professional Baseball Clubs
2004
United States v. Lennon United States v. Lennon
2004
Egervary v. Young Egervary v. Young
2004
Josey v. John R. Hollingsworth Corp. Josey v. John R. Hollingsworth Corp.
1993
Partnership v. Commercial Asset Trust I (Cat) Partnership v. Commercial Asset Trust I (Cat)
1993