Ulead Systems, Inc. v. Lex Computer & Management Corp. Ulead Systems, Inc. v. Lex Computer & Management Corp.

Ulead Systems, Inc. v. Lex Computer & Management Corp‪.‬

351 F.3d 1139, 2003.CFC.0000276 , S.P.Q.2d 1097(69 U)

    • USD 0.99
    • USD 0.99

Descripción editorial

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Lex Computer & Management Corp. (""Lex"") appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, granting summary judgment that United States Patent No. 4,538,188 (""the '188 patent"") is unenforceable and expired because Lex falsely claimed status (and paid maintenance fees) as a small entity. Lex also appeals the district court's award of attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 to Ulead Systems, Inc., a California corporation, (""Ulead-California"") and Ulead Systems, Inc., a Taiwan corporation (""Ulead-Taiwan""). Ulead-California and Ulead-Taiwan cross-appeal claiming that they should have been awarded additional attorneys' and expert witness fees.

GÉNERO
Técnicos y profesionales
PUBLICADO
2003
9 de diciembre
IDIOMA
EN
Inglés
EXTENSIÓN
35
Páginas
EDITORIAL
LawApp Publishers
VENDEDOR
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
TAMAÑO
89.3
KB

Más libros de United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Todd v. United States Todd v. United States
2004
Shedden v. Principi Shedden v. Principi
2004
Barrett v. Principi Barrett v. Principi
2004
Globetrotter Software, Inc. v. Christiano Globetrotter Software, Inc. v. Christiano
2004
Astronics Corp. v. Patecell Astronics Corp. v. Patecell
1988
Yeu v. Park Yeu v. Park
1993