![Undine Makeig v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Undine Makeig v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Undine Makeig v. State Texas
1990.TX.41833 ; 802 S.W.2D 59
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
This appeal was perfected to question the efficacy of a final judgment rendered on an appearance bond given in a felony offense. Approximately three months after rendition of judgment nisi on a $50,000 bond executed by Nazario Dominguez Lopez, as principal, and Undine Makeig, d/b/a E-Z Bail Bond, as surety, the trial court rendered final judgment. Makeigs subsequent motion for remittitur after forfeiture was granted only to the extent that the court ordered a partial remittitur of $25,000, less costs of suit.