![United States America v. Mcfadden](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States America v. Mcfadden](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States America v. Mcfadden
1980.C03.40356; 630 F.2D 963
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
(1) a defendant in a criminal proceeding has insisted on directing two successive court-appointed defense lawyers in legal decisions affecting his defense, threatening to sue them if his untutored legal directions are not followed and his release not secured, with the result that, at a time when the defense witness primarily relied on by defendant has been brought several hundred miles from the Danbury Correctional Institution at defendants request and all other witnesses are available for the trial, the court decides to relieve such second lawyer;