![United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission
542 P.2D 825, 25 ARIZ. APP. 244, 1975.AZ.40087
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Our decision in Adams v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona (1 CA-IC 1296), 26 Ariz. App. 289, 547 P.2d 1089 (1976), filed this day, relating to Rule 13d, Rules of Procedure for Workmens Compensation Hearings Before the Industrial Commission of Arizona (Nov. 1, 1973), requires the award herein to be set aside.