![United States v. Doering](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States v. Doering](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States v. Doering
983 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 01/19/1993)
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
Doering contends that the district court erred when it sentenced him to five years imprisonment by departing from the recommended Guideline range of 18-24 months. He claims (1) that the departure was unreasonable because it was based on factors that had been taken into account by the Guidelines, and (2) that the court failed to explain why the degree of departure was reasonable.