![United States v. Fisch](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States v. Fisch](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States v. Fisch
C09.40530; 474 F.2d 1071 (1973)
-
- USD 0.99
-
- USD 0.99
Descripción editorial
The case before us involves eavesdropping, not by the use of electronics or artificial means, but in the traditional ""listening at the keyhole"" sense. The convicted defendants were in a motel room and the agents listened from an adjoining room as the operation was discussed. The principal argument of appellants is that their right of privacy was thus invaded. The appellants were charged in a four count indictment with, count one, conspiring to import, count two, importing, count three, conspiring to possess with the intention of distributing, and count four, possessing with the intention of distributing approximately 70 pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 952, 960 and 963. After trial to the Court, appellant Fisch was found guilty on all four counts, and appellant Glasscock on counts one, two and three, but not guilty on count four. The case below is reported sub nom U.S. v. Perry, 339 F. Supp. 209 (S.D. Cal., 1972).