Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic"
Considerations of Jacques Maritain, John Deely and Thomistic Approaches to the Questions of These Times

Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic‪"‬

    • 7,99 zł
    • 7,99 zł

Publisher Description

Matthew K. Minerd Ph.D. considers the issue of ens rationis (mind-dependent being) through a sequence of vignettes, starting with Aristotle (5372-5452 U0’: Ubaid Zero Prime) and Avicenna (6780-6837), proceeding through Thomas Aquinas (7025-7074) and Hervaeus Natalis (7055-7123), and ending with Antoine Goudin (7439-7495). In 7819 U0’, he publishes “Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic” in the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
The essay flows on two levels, the text and the footnotes. The footnotes begin by referencing recent books on social construction. For our current Lebenswelt, social construction creates cognitive spaces for sensible construction to operate.
In light of this, we may wonder, “Are these cognitive spaces true or false?”
This is where Aristotle and Avicenna start.
But, there is more to social construction than true versus false. There is also true versus deception.
This is where the formal object of logic dawns in the awareness. Social constructions are not merely true or false, they may also be honest or deceptive. Logic may assist in sorting this out.
But, there is another layer, since true and honest may lead to catastrophic results.
The path is set for researching the historical development of an increasingly lucid definition of the nature of logic, as the science of objectivity transforming into intersubjectivity.
Minerd’s research includes the laborious translation of Latin texts. Bless him for that. Now, the time has come to play.

GENRE
Non-Fiction
RELEASED
2019
22 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
27
Pages
PUBLISHER
Razie Mah
SIZE
327
KB

More Books by Razie Mah

Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory
2015
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2
2024
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2
2024
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything"
2023

Other Books in This Series

Comments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Comments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism"
2021
Comments on Joseph Trabbic’s Essay (2021) "Jean-Luc Marion and ... First Philosophy" Comments on Joseph Trabbic’s Essay (2021) "Jean-Luc Marion and ... First Philosophy"
2021
A Reverie on Mark Spencer’s Essay (2021) "The Many Phenomenological Reductions" A Reverie on Mark Spencer’s Essay (2021) "The Many Phenomenological Reductions"
2021
Comments on Brian Kemple’s Essay (2020) "Signs and Reality" Comments on Brian Kemple’s Essay (2020) "Signs and Reality"
2021
Comments on John Brungardt’s Post (2019) "Those Two Roads" Comments on John Brungardt’s Post (2019) "Those Two Roads"
2020
Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization"
2019