Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen's Guide to Capital Punishment (Book Review) Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen's Guide to Capital Punishment (Book Review)

Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen's Guide to Capital Punishment (Book Review‪)‬

Suffolk University Law Review 2011, Wntr, 44, 1

    • 12,99 zł
    • 12,99 zł

Publisher Description

The issue of the death penalty, like abortion, deeply divides this country. To most americans, the answer to the question of whether the death penalty is unavoidable is obvious and beyond debate. It is "one of the most complex, emotional, controversial, and important public policy issues of our time." (3) american attitudes on the death penalty "have been relatively stable for almost a decade." (4) Two out of three Americans support capital punishment. A Gallup poll conducted in 2006 asked respondents how they would decide "between death or life in prison without parole." (5) Forty-eight percent of the respondents favored life without parole to capital punishment. (6) Too often, however, strongly held opinions on this topic are based on emotionally charged slogans rather than a reasoned consideration of the issue's complexities. Russell Murphy's book, Voices of the Death Penalty Debate: A Citizen's Guide to Capital Punishment (Voices), is a desperately needed book to educate citizens around the world on the difficult public policy issues raised by capital punishment. The book presents multiple theoretical, ideological, sociological, and personal perspectives on the death penalty debate. capital punishment continues to be one of the most passionate political disputes of our time, even though the number of death penalty sentences has been reduced by fifty percent in recent years.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2011
1 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
30
Pages
PUBLISHER
Suffolk University Law School
SIZE
287.7
KB

More Books by Suffolk University Law Review

Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Applies Ex Parte Young Doctrine to Allow State Agency's Action Against State Officials - Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services V. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration. Constitutional Law - Seventh Circuit Applies Ex Parte Young Doctrine to Allow State Agency's Action Against State Officials - Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services V. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration.
2011
A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme People's Court's Reply to Qi Yuling's Case (Infringement Upon Qi's Right of Name and Right to Receive Education) (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China) A Comment on the Rise and Fall of the Supreme People's Court's Reply to Qi Yuling's Case (Infringement Upon Qi's Right of Name and Right to Receive Education) (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
2010
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999: a Bridge Too Far? Or Not Far Enough? The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999: a Bridge Too Far? Or Not Far Enough?
2010
Arbitration Law - Second Circuit Holds Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act Does Not Permit Arbitration Panels to Issue Prehearing Document Subpoenas to Nonparties - Life Receivables Trust V. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London. Arbitration Law - Second Circuit Holds Section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act Does Not Permit Arbitration Panels to Issue Prehearing Document Subpoenas to Nonparties - Life Receivables Trust V. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London.
2010
A Constitutional Court for China Within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP. (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China) A Constitutional Court for China Within the Chinese Communist Party: Scientific Development and a Reconsideration of the Institutional Role of the CCP. (Symposium: Constitutional Review in the People's Republic of China)
2010
My Dog Ate My Email: Creating a Comprehensive Adverse Inference Instruction Standard for Spoliation of Electronic Evidence. My Dog Ate My Email: Creating a Comprehensive Adverse Inference Instruction Standard for Spoliation of Electronic Evidence.
2009