01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter 01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter

01/13/95 State Minnesota V. James Robert Porter

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

1. Statements in a prosecutor's closing argument suggesting that jurors would be suckers for acquitting a defendant and that there is no salve or sedative that would make them feel good about acquitting a defendant constitute serious misconduct.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1995
13 de janeiro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
18
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
68,5
KB

Mais livros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982