![Alice Mcsherry v. City St. Paul.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Alice Mcsherry v. City St. Paul.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Alice Mcsherry v. City St. Paul.
1938.MN.49, 277 N.W. 541, 202 MINN. 102
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
1. What is casual employment as distinguished from that which is regular is to be determined with principal reference to the scope and purpose of the hiring rather than with sole regard to the duration and regularity of service. Where there is a continuing engagement to serve the employer in his business at such times as the particular and essential service may be needed, the employment is not casual but regular.