America's Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice (Panel III: Truth, The Jury, And the Adversarial System) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth) America's Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice (Panel III: Truth, The Jury, And the Adversarial System) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth)

America's Adversarial and Jury Systems: More Likely to Do Justice (Panel III: Truth, The Jury, And the Adversarial System) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth‪)‬

Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 2003, Wntr, 26, 1

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrição da editora

This Article aims to answer the following question: Are the American and British adversarial systems, which rely heavily on juries, or the German and Continental inquisitorial non-adversarial systems, which operate without juries, more likely to result in justice? The Article advocates for America's adversarial and jury systems because they are logically superior and, in my experience, they most often succeed in rendering justice. I. ADVERSARIAL VS. INQUISITORIAL SYSTEM

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2003
1 de janeiro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
19
EDITORA
Harvard Society for Law and Public Policy, Inc.
TAMANHO
304,3
KB
Antitrust in an Era of Market Failure. Antitrust in an Era of Market Failure.
2010
Resisting the Ratchet. Resisting the Ratchet.
2008
The Conservative Case for Precedent. The Conservative Case for Precedent.
2008
An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren (Response to Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Vol. 29, P. 769, 2006) An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren (Response to Steven G. Calabresi and James Lindgren, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. Vol. 29, P. 769, 2006)
2007
Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism. Market Rights and the Rule of Law: A Case for Procedural Constitutionalism.
2003
Ending the war on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay Detainees (Twenty-Fourth Federalist Society Student Symposium, Law and Freedom) Ending the war on Terrorism One Terrorist at a Time: A Noncriminal Detention Model for Holding and Releasing Guantanamo Bay Detainees (Twenty-Fourth Federalist Society Student Symposium, Law and Freedom)
2005