![Dalton v. State Indiana](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Dalton v. State Indiana](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Dalton v. State Indiana
1952.IN.30095; 105 N.E.2D 509; 230 IND. 626
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
of an accident (§ 47-1910, Burns 1940 Replacement), upon which he was sentenced to the Indiana State Prison for one year. Alleged errors occurring before filing of the motion for a new trial are embodied therein as permitted by Rule 2-6 as amended. It is not necessary to state a summary of evidence given on the trial, since our decision on the ruling of the trial court in overruling appellants motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a search and seizure will decide appellants contention that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law, and makes it unnecessary to decide other errors concerning admissibility of the evidence on trial.