![Daniel C. White v. Idaho forest Industries](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daniel C. White v. Idaho forest Industries](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daniel C. White v. Idaho forest Industries
1977.ID.15151; 572 P.2D 887; 98 IDAHO 784
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Claimant White was a member of the stand-by crew at Idaho Forest Industries (I.F.I.). Permanent workers have various privileges regarding absences from work. In the nature of things, stand-by workers have no such privileges, and are expected to be on-call at all times. White was discharged in June, 1976, on the grounds that in one week he had twice failed to report for work when called to replace absent workers. White applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was denied, both at the determination and redetermination stages, because he was found to have been discharged for "misconduct" in connection with his employment.