![Daniel Ken Evans v. Albert Park and Jane](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Daniel Ken Evans v. Albert Park and Jane](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Daniel Ken Evans v. Albert Park and Jane
ID.15013; 732 P.2d 369; 112 Idaho 400 (1987)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Appellant Daniel Evans, a social guest at the home of respondents Park, suffered an injury when he slipped and fell on ice covering the front steps of the Park residence. He sued for damages. At trial, the jury found in favor of the Parks. Judgment was entered accordingly. We affirm. Evans presents two issues on appeal. He first asks us to redefine the duty a landowner owes to social guests, abolishing the common law distinctions among categories of entrants upon private property. Evans also asks us to determine whether the district court erred in excluding certain testimony.