Danny King v. State Indiana

Danny King (King) appeals from his conviction for unlawful dealing in hashish,[Footnote 1] claiming error in (1) denying his Motion to Dismiss, (2) admission of testimony of a telephone conversation, (3) permitting a police officer to testify as an expert, (4) allowing the prosecution to attempt to examine a witness who refused to testify on the grounds of self-incrimination, (5) refusing to allow certain questions on cross-examination of a prosecutions expert witness, and (6) insufficiency of the evidence.