Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co. Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co.

Federal Pacific Electric Company v. Rao Electric Equipment Co‪.‬

NY.48638; 221 N.Y.S.2d 745; 15 A.D.2d 456 (1961)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Order and judgment granting plaintiff summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in this action for goods sold and delivered, unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff an absolute order of preclusion and judgment on the pleadings, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. This was not a proper motion on which to grant summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or to grant judgment on the merits. However, under the alternative relief requested by plaintiff in its notice of motion, Special Term could have granted the relief which this court now grants, the record indisputably establishing plaintiff's right to such relief in the exercise of discretion and as a matter of law. Rule 113 searches the evidentiary facts in the case to determine the existence or absence of an issue of fact. Hence, the requirement, generally, for a party's affidavit, and the inadequacy of plaintiff's proof in this respect. In this case, however, plaintiff established that defendant should be totally precluded on its counterclaim. Consequently, upon such preclusion, plaintiff was entitled to judgment on the pleadings, the order of preclusion serving to limit defendant's pleading, leaving only admissions of the cause of action in chief. Since it would serve no useful purpose to remit the parties to proceedings the outcome of which would be, on this record, inescapable, this court does what Special Term could have done in the first instance (Civ. Prac. Act, § 584; 9 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, pp. 183-186; cf. De Rosa v. Slattery Contr. Co., 14 A.D.2d 278). Settle order on notice. Disposition Order and judgment granting plaintiff summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in this action for goods sold and delivered, unanimously modified, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiff an absolute order of preclusion and judgment on the pleadings, with costs to plaintiff-respondent.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1961
7 de dezembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
1
Página
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
71,3
KB

Mais livros de Supreme Court of New York

Hwesu S. Murray Hwesu S. Murray
1991
Bsl Development Corp. Bsl Development Corp.
1991
Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board
1991
Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady
1991
Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services
1991
People State New York v. Darryl Morgan People State New York v. Darryl Morgan
1991