Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine

Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine

87 CAL.RPTR.3D 518, 169 CAL.APP.4TH 1524, 2009 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 443, 09 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 415, 2008.CA.0011507

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Sarkis Ghazaryan appeals from the trial courts order denying his motion to certify a class of limousine drivers allegedly undercompensated by Diva Limousine, Ltd. (Diva) in violation of California wage and hour laws. Ghazaryans lawsuit contests Divas policy of paying its drivers an hourly rate for assigned trips but failing to pay for on-call time between assignments (referred to by Diva employees as "gap time"). Because the trial court incorrectly focused on the potential difficulty of assessing the validity of Divas compensation policy in light of variations in how drivers spend their gap time, we reverse the courts denial of the motion and remand with directions to certify Ghazaryans two proposed subclasses.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2008
22 de dezembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
22
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
79,7
KB

Mais livros de Colorado Supreme Court

People v. Newman People v. Newman
1996
People v. Rotenberg People v. Rotenberg
1996
People v. Murray People v. Murray
1996
Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver Padilla v. School Dist. No. 1 in the City and County of Denver
2001
In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction In re J.P. Meyer Trucking and Construction
2001
People v. Doherty People v. Doherty
1996