Giano v. Goord Giano v. Goord

Giano v. Goord

380 F.3D 670, 2004.C02.0000913

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Julio Giano, an inmate at Wende Correctional Facility ("Wende") in Alden, New York, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, alleging that, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the defendants, various state and Wende officials, retaliated against him for filing an earlier lawsuit against prison authorities and for prevailing in a disciplinary proceeding. The district court (Siragusa, J.) dismissed Gianos pro se complaint, on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to exhaust available administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Following our holding in Lawrence v. Goord, 238 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2001), that the PLRA did not require plaintiffs to exhaust retaliation claims, we vacated the district courts decision. Giano v. Goord, 250 F.3d 146, 150 (2d Cir. 2001).

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2004
18 de agosto
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
20
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
62,6
KB

Mais livros de 2003 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term

Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble
2005
Lillbask v. State of Connecticut Department of Education Lillbask v. State of Connecticut Department of Education
2005
United States v. Bruno United States v. Bruno
2004
United States v. Fiore United States v. Fiore
2004
Hemstreet v. Greiner Hemstreet v. Greiner
2004
Mfs Securities Corp. v. Securities and Exchange Commission Mfs Securities Corp. v. Securities and Exchange Commission
2004