Gifford-Hill & Company v. Jack W. Stoller
1986.NE.30 , 380 N.W.2D 625, 221 NEB. 757
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Defendant maintains that (1) plaintiff failed to establish or sustain his case; (2) it established a complete defense to the action; (3) the Trial Court admitted certain incompetent evidence; (4) a mistrial should have been ordered because the foreman of the jury was not indifferent; (5) the Trial Court erred in its instructions to the jury relative to cheating and malice; (6) the verdict was against the law and the evidence and was grossly excessive.