![Gloria Nogid v. Henry Nogid](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Gloria Nogid v. Henry Nogid](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Gloria Nogid v. Henry Nogid
NY.46424; 388 N.Y.S.2d 646; 54 A.D.2d 961 (1976)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Defendant has not clearly demonstrated that the issues of support and alimony can be resolved on motion papers (see Sarnicola v Sarnicola, 50 A.D.2d 842; Matter of Garritano v Garritano, 49 A.D.2d 906). In the absence of compelling proof, a hearing is necessary (cf. Casola v Casola, 235 N.Y.S.2d 495). Further, the direction for further disclosure was not improper (see Domestic Relations Law, § 250; CPLR 3101; Perse v Perse, 52 A.D.2d 60). Disposition Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements.