![Goad v. Florida Department of Corrections](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Goad v. Florida Department of Corrections](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Goad v. Florida Department of Corrections
845 SO.2D 880, 2003.FL.0001179
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
We have for review an Order and Final Judgment of Dismissal of a class action based upon the trial courts determination that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) has the right to require a medical provider to submit to an Examination Under Oath (EUO) when that provider had accepted from State Farms insured an assignment of benefits and had asserted the right to pursue personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. For the following reasons, we reverse.