![Goff v. Barnhart](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Goff v. Barnhart](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Goff v. Barnhart
421 F.3D 785, 2005.C08.0001304
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Geneva Goff appeals from the district courts order affirming the Commissioner of Social Securitys denial of her application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Goff claims she is disabled because two strokes have affected her walking, motor capabilities, and speech. She also claims she suffers from depression. On appeal, Goff argues the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by: 1) failing to give proper weight to the opinions of Goffs treating physician and psychiatrist, 2) discounting her subjective complaints of pain, and 3) finding Goff could perform the work of a companion or personal assistant. We affirm the decision of the district court.