![Goldman v. American Dealers Service Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Goldman v. American Dealers Service Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Goldman v. American Dealers Service Inc.
1943.C02.40219 135 F.2D 398
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
There is no statutory provision for the institution of forfeiture proceedings with respect to documents seized under 39 U.S.C.A. § 498. Accordingly, we construe the order of the district court as requiring the return of the seized check unless proceedings were promptly brought for violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 304.