Gordon v. Nissan Motor Co‪.‬

Plaintiff and appellant Scott Gordon sustained severe injuries when a Nissan Pathfinder he was driving rolled over. Gordon claims that the manufacturer of the vehicle, defendant and respondent Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., is liable for his injuries because the vehicle was defectively unstable. He also claims that the Pathfinders roof was defective because it was not crashworthy, that is, it was not adequately designed to withstand a rollover.