Grand Chute v. Winegar. in Equity

Mr. G. W. Lakin, for the appellant; Mr. H. L. Palmer, contra. The inquiry at once suggests itself upon reading the bill in this case, why does the plaintiff file it? Can any relief be had in this suit which could not be obtained in the suit sought to be enjoined? It is an elementary principle of equity law that, when full and adequate relief can be obtained in a suit at law, a suit in equity cannot be maintained. In Hipp v. Babin1 the court say: 'The bill in this case is in substance and legal effect an ejectment bill.