Has the Bowsher Doctrine Solved the Debate? the Relationship Between Standing and Intervention As of Right. Has the Bowsher Doctrine Solved the Debate? the Relationship Between Standing and Intervention As of Right.

Has the Bowsher Doctrine Solved the Debate? the Relationship Between Standing and Intervention As of Right‪.‬

Notre Dame Law Review 2009, March, 84, 3

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrição da editora

INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act of 1934, (1) Congress delegated its rulemaking power to the Supreme Court in order to unify the procedural rules governing the federal judiciary. (2) With this delegated authority, the Supreme Court developed the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which "govern the procedure in all civil actions and proceedings in the United States district courts" and are "construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action." (3) Thus, when regulating judicial proceedings, courts apply the Rules with an eye toward achieving these objectives. However, the goals of facilitating fair, expedient, and inexpensive judicial actions must be interpreted in light of constitutional conditions such as the "case" and "controversy" requirements of Article III (4)--for "it is axiomatic that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not create or withdraw federal jurisdiction." (5)

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2009
1 de março
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
78
EDITORA
University of Notre Dame Law School
TAMANHO
365,7
KB

Mais livros de Notre Dame Law Review

Collateral Censorship and the Limits of Intermediary Immunity. Collateral Censorship and the Limits of Intermediary Immunity.
2011
Scary Monsters: Hybrids, Mashups, And Other Illegitimate Children (Creativity and the Law) Scary Monsters: Hybrids, Mashups, And Other Illegitimate Children (Creativity and the Law)
2011
A Note on Incentives, Rights, And the Public Domain in Copyright Law. (Symposium: Creativity and the Law) A Note on Incentives, Rights, And the Public Domain in Copyright Law. (Symposium: Creativity and the Law)
2011
Atypical Inventions (Creativity and the Law) Atypical Inventions (Creativity and the Law)
2011
Race to Judgment? an Empirical Study of Scott V. Harris and Summary Judgment. Race to Judgment? an Empirical Study of Scott V. Harris and Summary Judgment.
2010
Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges? Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?
2009