Herman Gehrke v. Frank H. Weiss And Herman Gehrke v. Frank H. Weiss And

Herman Gehrke v. Frank H. Weiss And

1939.MN.47 , 284 N.W. 434, 204 MINN. 445

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

Relator Ramsey County appeals from a decision of the Minnesota Tax Court granting partial summary judgment to respondents Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. and Petula Associates, Inc. (collectively "Brookfield"), and denying summary judgment to Ramsey County. On remand from this court, the issue before the tax court was whether an assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value for a development property for tax assessment purposes was invalid because the assessor did not comply with the statutory certification requirements set forth in Minn. Stat. 备273.76, subd. 8 (1984). The tax court determined the statute required the assessor to conduct an independent valuation analysis and found that because there was no evidence to show the assessor conducted such an analysis the agreement was invalid. We reverse, concluding that the certification statute requires only an estimate of value based on the assessors judgment, and that Brookfield failed to rebut the presumption that the assessor complied with the statutory certification requirements.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1939
10 de fevereiro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
8
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
63
KB

Mais livros de Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Melvin S. Waltz State v. Melvin S. Waltz
1952
Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary Carol Virginia Gleason v. Ben Geary
1943
C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T C. M. Dahl and Another v. Henry T
1938
Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine Pearl and A. J. Martin v. Josephine
1931
State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V. State Ex Rel. Ivan and Mildred Bowen V.
1930
Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing Wallace C. Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing
1982