Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education. Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education.

Hostile Takeover: The State of Missouri, The St. Louis School District, And the Struggle for Quality Education in the Inner-City: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis V. Missouri State Board of Education‪.‬

Missouri Law Review 2009, Fall, 74, 4

    • 2,99 €
    • 2,99 €

Descrição da editora

I. INTRODUCTION Missouri has been home to many of the landmark moments in the struggle for racial equality. (2) The Missouri Compromise saved the Union; almost four decades later, the determination that Missouri slave Dred Scott was mere property split the Union. (3) During the Civil War that followed, more battles and skirmishes took place in Missouri than in any other state outside of Virginia and Tennessee. (4) After the Civil War Amendments abolished slavery and guaranteed every person equal protection of the law, (5) the United States Supreme Court allowed a Jefferson City, Missouri, inn to refuse service to blacks. (6) The Court later relied upon this decision when creating the "separate but equal" doctrine in Plessy v. Ferguson. (7) This Plessy doctrine began to unravel when aspiring law student Lloyd Gaines won his desegregation lawsuit against the University of Missouri School of Law in 1938.8 Subsequent decisions in cases originating in St. Louis struck down the enforceability of racial covenants and upheld the congressional ban on housing discrimination. (9) Because the era of court-ordered desegregation arguably began in Missouri with Lloyd Gaines, it is somewhat fitting that the era also concluded in Missouri when the Supreme Court stopped the Kansas City school desegregation program.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
2009
22 de setembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
51
EDITORA
University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law
TAMANHO
358,7
KB

Mais livros de Missouri Law Review

Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) Using Judicial Performance Evaluations to Supplement Inappropriate Voter Cues and Enhance Judicial Legitimacy (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
Comments on the White, Caufield, And Tarr Articles (Response to Articles in This Issue, P. 573, 605, 635) (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) Comments on the White, Caufield, And Tarr Articles (Response to Articles in This Issue, P. 573, 605, 635) (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan: The Least Political Method of Selecting High Quality Judges (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) The Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan: The Least Political Method of Selecting High Quality Judges (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
The Foreclosure Purchase by the Equity of Redemption Holder Or Other Junior Interests: When Should Principles of Fairness and Morality Trump Normal Priority Rules?(Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman) The Foreclosure Purchase by the Equity of Redemption Holder Or Other Junior Interests: When Should Principles of Fairness and Morality Trump Normal Priority Rules?(Symposium: A Festschrift in Honor of Dale A. Whitman)
2007
The Missouri Plan in National Perspective (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems) The Missouri Plan in National Perspective (Symposium: Mulling over the Missouri Plan: A Review of State Judicial Selection and Retention Systems)
2009
Epiphenomenal Indigent Defense. (Broke and Broken: Can We Fix Our State Indigent Defense System?) Epiphenomenal Indigent Defense. (Broke and Broken: Can We Fix Our State Indigent Defense System?)
2010