Howard v. Lockheed-Georgia Co. Howard v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.

Howard v. Lockheed-Georgia Co‪.‬

742 F.2d 612, 1984.C11.40503

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Descrição da editora

In this action for breach of the duty of fair representation by the plaintiff's union, the district court entered summary judgment for defendants because plaintiff had not both filed and served his complaint within the six-month period required by the applicable statute of limitations, § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 160(b). We affirm. The United States Supreme Court, in DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 103 S. Ct. 2281, 76 L. Ed. 2d 476 (1983), held that the six-month limitations period in § 10(b) governs claims of this kind against both employers and unions. The issue on this appeal is whether filing within the statutory period is sufficient, or whether the complaint must also be served within that period.

GÉNERO
Profissional e técnico
LANÇADO
1984
24 de setembro
IDIOMA
EN
Inglês
PÁGINAS
4
EDITORA
LawApp Publishers
TAMANHO
60
KB

Mais livros de Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Power Plant Division v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission Power Plant Division v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
1981
Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta Fitzpatrick v. City of Atlanta
1993
Davis v. Great Western Bank Davis v. Great Western Bank
1993
Wiley v. Thomas Wiley v. Thomas
1993
Arlook v. Lichtenberg Arlook v. Lichtenberg
1992
Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts Cumberland Memorial Gardens v. Roberts
1992