In Re Antonio R.
1990.CA.40215 275 CAL. RPTR. 442; 226 CAL. APP. 3D 476
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Descrição da editora
Scherri Charissa Nealy appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) entered following a court trial resulting in her conviction of possessing cocaine base for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5.) Prior thereto, she unsuccessfully brought a motion to suppress evidence. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) She contends: "I. The trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence for a violation of the knock and announce procedures. II. The content of the incoming phone calls is inadmissible evidence in that it is relevant only to prove the implied hearsay itself."